Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Altantuya Shaariibuu: Your Guide to the Facts

1. The Victim

Name:

The victim: Passport photo
Altantuya Shaariibuu. Has also been referred to as @ Aminah Abdullah @ Anna Ana Ang.

NST used the name Anna Ana Ang @ Aminah on 7 Nov, then Attantuya Shariibu @ Aminah on 8 Nov, then Attantuya Shaariibuu @ Aminah Abdullah on 9 Nov.

On 9 Nov NST reported that “Syed Abdul Rahman said Attantuya’s sister, Altantuya Shaariibuu, came to his office on Oct 28 to discuss her (Attantuya’s) disappearance before lodging a police report.” But then on 10 Nov NST used the name Altantuya Shaariibuu until today.

The Star, citing Bernama, used the name Anna Ana Ang on 7 Nov, Altantuya Shaariibuu @ Anna on 8 & 9 Nov, and then just Altantuya Shaariibuu from 10 Nov until now.

Harian Metro 7 Nov used the name Anna, then on 8 Nov used the names Anna Ana Ang @ Al Tantuya @ Aminah, then from 9 Nov until 12 Nov used the names Altantuya Shaariibu @ Aminah @ Anna Ana but on Nov 13 started using only the name Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Harian Metro 10 Nov, reported the Honorary Consul as saying “Wanita berkenaan juga tidak menggunakan atau mempunyai nama ‘Aminah’ seperti dilaporkan sebelum ini.”


Altantuya: Picture from Mongolian newspaper

Religion:

Buddhist.

Reports that she was also called “Aminah” led to many believing her to be a Muslim.

The Star 9 Nov reported that the Honorary Consul for Mongolia in Malaysia, Datuk Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi had said that “Altantuya's family claimed to have in their possession a valid marriage certificate, he said, adding that she might have converted to Islam in Mongolia. ”

But Harian Metro 10 Nov, reported the Honorary Consul as saying “Pasangan itu tidak pernah berkahwin atau wanita berkenaan sudah memeluk Islam. Ia tidak tepat dan boleh menimbulkan kekeliruan.”

The subject of her religion was not raised again until 17 Nov when the family gave her a Buddhist funeral at the crime scene at Puncak Alam Shah Alam.

Age: 28

Occupation:

She was reported to be a model as early as 8 Nov by all Malaysian newspapers. That she might not be a model is reported in The Star Nov 10 which carried out a telephone interview with Mongolian Messenger editor-in-chief Indra Borhondoi. Mr Borhondoi said that local modelling agencies in Mongolia had never heard of her.

In Star 12 Nov, her cousin Amy is reported to have said that “Altantuya is a university graduate, teacher and also a translator. She owns a travel agency. … and is a part-time model … She always travels overseas for business.”

S. Ouynaa, a close friend who went to school with her for an English course, said Altantuya was involved in the textile and clothing business and imported the items from China, after returning from Paris. (in the Star, Nov 15)

In Star Nov 16, Altantuya’s mother said that she never modelled. “People think she was a model because she was pretty”, she said

Descriptions of the Victim:

On 8 Nov, Harian Metro said, “Gambaran awal menunjukkan mangsa mempunyai fizikal tubuh badan yang tinggi, jelita, rambut lurus paras bahu selain kerap tampil berpakaian seksi.”

Star 8 Nov: “said to be a stunning beauty from Ulaanbaatar”

Star 12 Nov: “She is a very loving person, beautiful inside and out. She received formal education. She lived in Russia until she was 12 years old. She is really an attractive person.” said the cousin who wished to be known only as Amy.

More from Amy, Star 12 Nov: “She speaks among other languages English, Russian and Chinese (Mandarin). She has her own house and car.”

The Star, 15 Nov: Altantuya had a mole on the right side of her upper lip and it was removed about five years ago. “She had the birth mark removed to make her look more attractive,” said S. Ouynaa, a close friend who went to school with her for an English course. (This mole removal thing confirmed by Altantuya’s mother, reported in the Star 16 Nov.)

The Star 15 Nov: Altantuya was also very fashion conscious and would always dress to kill even for a normal occasion – more from S. Ouynaa,

The Star 15 Nov: “She was a smart woman and she knew how to survive even in the toughest environment” – Maadai, Altantuya’s ex-husband,

Family Details:

Father: Shaariibuu Setev, director of centre of information and education, National University of Mongolia. (Star 12 Nov). Before 12 Nov, some papers reported differently. NST 9 Nov said “Her father is a contractor in the Sukhbaatar district, near the Mongolian capital of Ulan Bator.”

Mother: Sh Altantsetseg

Sister, Altantzul, 27

Q: Is Altantuya married or single?

The Mother claimed she was married once, to Maadai, a popular Mongolian singer from the Khar Sarnai (Black Rose) band which is famous for its American-style pop music (The Star Nov 16)

A family friend, interviewed by the Star, said Altantuya married Maadai in 1996 when she was 18. Maadai was then 22. They divorced after 2 years. She then married S. Khunikhuu, the son of a famous designer. They divorced two years later without having any children. (The Star Nov 15)

Q: Does she have kids?

From the start, all major Malaysian newspapers except for the Star claimed that Altantuya and Razak Baginda has a 16-month-old love child.

As early as 7 Nov, Harian Metro said this, “Menurut sumber … Anna, berusia 30-an, menjalin hubungan cinta sebelum mengadakan hubungan seks dengan lelaki Malaysia terbabit ketika dia melawat Mongolia, tahun lalu. Hubungan itu menyebabkan Anna melahirkan seorang bayi di negara asalnya, tahun ini.”

Then, on 9 Nov, Harian Metro said this, “Menurut sumber … Pada masa sama, bapa Altantuya dijangka tiba ke negara ini dalam tempoh terdekat membawa bersama cucunya berumur 16 bulan yang dikatakan hasil hubungan sulit wanita itu dengan seorang penganalisis politik tanah air.”,

and this

“Mangsa datang ke Malaysia pada 6 Oktober lalu bersama seorang sepupunya untuk mencari penganalisis politik berkenaan yang didakwa suaminya dan bapa kepada bayi mereka berusia 16 bulan.”

and this

“Syed Abdul Rahman berkata, hasil hubungan intim pasangan itu, mereka dikurniakan seorang anak lelaki berusia setahun empat bulan. Bagaimanapun, kanak-kanak ini menderita penyakit ‘Hidrocephalus’ iaitu lebihan cecair di kepala yang memerlukan pembedahan segera dan kini ditempatkan di sebuah hospital di Ulan Bator, Mongolia.”

NST also carried the same allegation. On 7 Nov, NST said “The case, which has led to the detention of three members of the police force, has been linked to the affair between the analyst and the victim which had started from a sexual encounter during the former's visit to Mongolia last year, and which had also resulted in the birth of a baby.”

Treating this as a fact, NST said on 9 Nov that “The father of Attantuya Shaariibuu, victim of a gruesome murder, is expected to arrive here on Monday accompanied by his 16-month-old grandson.”

Utusan Malaysia also came out with the same allegation on 8 Nov, also citing “sumber”.

However, on 10 Nov, Harian Metro and NST changed the story. They suddenly came out with the news that the 16-month-old baby was not Altantuya’s kid with Razak Baginda.

Harian Metro said,

“Bagaimanapun sumber memberitahu, anak wanita berkenaan yang berusia 16 bulan bukan hasil hubungan penganalisis politik terbabit. … Difahamkan, penganalisis politik terbabit yang mendapat tahu anak berkenaan bukan hasil hubungannya menjauhkan diri daripada wanita berkenaan.”

and

“Kesamaran status anak lelaki warga Mongolia yang dibunuh, Altantuya Shaariibuu, sama ada ia hasil hubungan sulit dengan seorang penganalisis politik tempatan terjawab apabila disahkan bukan hasil hubungan pasangan itu.

Status berkenaan dinyatakan Konsul Kehormat Kedutaan Mongolia di Malaysia, Datuk Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi, yang mengatakan laporan sebenar perkara itu sebelum ini disalah lapor oleh media.

Kanak-kanak berusia 16 bulan itu lahir sebelum Altantuya serta penganalisis politik tempatan itu menjalinkan hubungan.”

NST also reported the same denial, and from that day onwards, stopped any mention about the 16-month-old baby.

The family itself denied the existence of the 16-month old baby.

The Star 16 Nov : The Mother claimed the victim had a 10-year old kid with Maadai named Atanshagai. Altantuya also had a 3-year-old kid with a different father who is also Mongolian, but the victim never married him. (). The Mother denied the existence of any 16-month-old kid, as alleged in Malaysian newspapers.

NST 16 Nov: “The father admitted that Altantuya has two sons, ages nine and three, but said his daughter was only married once. Her husband was a rock star in Mongolia.”

The Star 12 Nov : The cousin, Amy, neither denied nor confirmed the existence of the alleged 16-month-old kid, although she admitted Altantuya has a sick son named Altanchagai.


Amy


The Star 15 Nov : The family friend claimed that both children are living with her parents in a three-bedroom apartment in a 12-storey block at 34th Street in Ulanbataar, an upmarket residential area behind the popular shopping zone in the city.

The Star 16 Nov : But the Mother said the children lived with Altantuya.

Other Background Details:

NST 9 Nov: “She has completed secondary school education”.

Star 15 Nov: Altantuya attended High School 84 at the Bayazurkh district.

Star 15 Nov: She enrolled in Otgontenger University, a private education centre specialising in business and language studies in November 1996 but left school in January 1997, but, “She was absent most of the time. She skipped classes and examinations. She never completed the course because she was pregnant.”, said D. Orlomkhorol, university director.

Star 15 Nov: She went to Paris in 2000 and enrolled in a modelling school there after her divorce. “She was there briefly and got a certificate for modelling”, said Opoccoo Puntzag, Altantuya’s biology teacher in High School 84

2. The Accused Persons

Policeman 1 – Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, 30, from the elite Special Action Force (UTK) in Federal headquarters in Bukit Aman. Member of escort guard branch, tasked with the protection of VIPs (Star 8 Nov). Charged under s 302 of the Penal Code for murder.

NST 16 Nov said that “Azilah, believed to be from Sarawak, was an investigating officer with the Sepang district police headquarters for at least five years before he joined the Special Action Squad in 2002.

NST 16 Nov also said that Azilah is “a bachelor, he is said to be in a relationship with a lance corporal attached to the Petaling Jaya anti-vice unit.” (the Policewoman suspect)

Policeman 2 – corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, 35 member of the Special Action Force (UTK), member of escort guard branch, tasked with the protection of VIPs (Star Nov 8). Charged under s 302 of the Penal Code for murder. He is said to be married with a child. (NST 16 Nov)


Sirul Azhar Umar (left) & Azilah Hadri

*Reports differ as to the rank of Policeman 2. The above facts is from The Star, but Harian Metro, NST and Bernama say that he is a police constable, not a corporal.

Abdul Razak Baginda – Top Malaysian strategic and defence analyst. [Click here]


Razak Baginda

3. Also Remanded:

Policewoman - detective lance corporal from the anti-vice and gaming branch (D7) in Petaling Jaya. She was remanded with the two Policemen accused with murder, but was released on police bail. She was said to have a relationship with Policeman 1, Azilah Hadri (NST 16 Nov)

46-year-old private investigator
35-year-old ex-cop (Harian Metro & Guang Ming Daily said he is also a private investigator)

These two PIs were first remanded for investigation folowing the victim’s police report she made on 19 October, where she said she was being threatened to be put in jail. (Utusan Malaysia 10 Nov). They were released but were rearrested on 15 Nov to assist police in their ongoing investigations into Altantuya’s murder.

On Nov 22, the two PIs were released on a RM50,000 court bond each as provided for under Section 49 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Star 23 Nov said they would be testifying as prosecution witnesses during the trial of the two policemen. The same Star report also said that the female lance corporal is also likely to be one of the main prosecution witnesses in the case.

Note that both Altantuya and Razak Baginda had engaged PIs. So if these two were the only PIs detained to assist investigation, then 1 must be the PI engaged by Altantuya and the other the PI engaged by Razak Baginda.

4. Other Characters Involved:

1. Amy, the victim’s cousin
2. Namiraa Gerelmaa, a friend of the victim (NST 18 Nov claimed that Amy and Namiraa Gerelmaa is the same person)
3. Honorary Consul for Mongolia in Malaysia, Datuk Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi
4. Mazlinda Makhzan, Razak Baginda’s wife who is a former Magistrate
5. The lawyers - Datuk Muhammad Shafee Abdullah & M. Puravalen (representing Abdul Razak Baginda), Shaun Tan Kee Shaan for Policeman 1 and Policeman 2


Father and cousins: Shaariibuu, Amy & Ochir

5. Relationship Between Persons Involved:

Razak Baginda & Policeman 1 & 2:

Of course, now we know from the charge against Razak Baginda what his relationship with Policeman 1 & 2 is.

Razak was charged of having abetted C/Insp Azilah Hadri and Kpl Sirul Azhar Umar to commit the murder of Altantuya between 9.54am and 11.05am on Oct 18 at Level 10, Bangunan Getah Asli, 148, Jalan Ampang.

So, investigations must have showed that the 3 met the day before Altantuya died at Razak Baginda's office. But Razak was not charged as the one asking the police to commit the murder, only for helping them. How he help them will be proved during trial.

Before the charge, only twice did the papers mentioned anything about Razak's relations with the 2 policemen.

On Nov 8 Harian Metro, citing a “sumber polis”, put it like this: “Berikutan gangguan melampau, kenamaan berkenaan meminta bantuan anggota polis di Unit Tindakan Khas (UTK) Bukit Aman yang dikenali untuk ‘menyelesaikan’ masalah itu”. However Harian Metro did not specifically say that this “anggota polis” is the same anggota polis that was arrested or not.

NST 10 Nov: “It is learnt that the analyst sought help from police friends after alleging that no action was being taken on his two earlier reports. A private investigator, whom he had also hired to keep the woman away from him and his family, had also allegedly failed.”

Razak Baginda & the Private Investigator(s):

“The PIs were believed to have been hired by Razak. Altantuya had lodged a police report against them on Oct 19, claiming that they had threatened to throw her into jail. According to Altantuya’s report made at Balai Polis Tun H.S. Lee, they were alleged to have made the threats to her at 5am on Oct 19 at Hotel Malaya where she was staying with her sister and cousin.” (Star Nov 10)

But note that both Altantuya and Razak Baginda had engaged PIs. So if these two were the only PIs detained to assist investigation, then 1 must be the PI engaged by Altantuya and the other the PI engaged by Razak Baginda.

Razak Baginda & the Victim:

There are numerous conflicting reports on this matter.

All the newspapers reported that they had an affair. Read for yourself some excerpts:-

NST 7 Nov: “The case, which has led to the detention of three members of the police force, has been linked to the affair between the analyst and the victim which had started from a sexual encounter during the former's visit to Mongolia last year, and which had also resulted in the birth of a baby.”

NST 9 Nov: “Attantuya Shaariibuu’s family alleges that she and the analyst enjoyed more than just a platonic relationship. They allege that he paid for her trip to South Africa in December last year and spent holidays in Europe and South Africa. … They claim that they knew of her relationship with the analyst and had met him. The analyst does not deny knowing Attantuya but alleges that it is impossible that the child is his.”

NST 9 Nov: “Syed Abdul Rahman also said that Attantuya had been to Malaysia several times since March 2004 and that her close relationship with the political analyst was "no secret" and was known by the woman’s family members.

He said the political analyst would meet up with Attantuya in Shanghai and they would return to Malaysia together.”

"During each meeting, he will give Attantuya gifts in the form of jewellery, including diamonds. He had also deposited US$30,000 (RM108,000) into Attantuya’s account," said Syed Abdul Rahman.

Her family also kept receipts for the purchase of the jewellery and also photographs of them together. The couple had also visited South Africa and several European countries.

He said the political analyst had also promised to buy Attantuya a house in Malaysia.”

Harian Metro 9 Nov: “Hubungan itu bukan saja tidak ubah seperti pasangan suami isteri, malah penganalisis terbabit pernah beberapa kali menemui ibu bapa mangsa ketika dia berada di kampungnya di Sukhbaatar, Mongolia.

Dia juga membiayai sepenuhnya tiket penerbangan atas nama Altantuya atau mesra dengan panggilan Anna Ana Ang yang dibeli dari sebuah agensi pelancongan di Jalan Raja Chulan di sini.

Selain itu, penganalisis itu yang juga seorang kenamaan (VIP) di negara ini, pernah memasukkan wang AS$30,000 (RM114,000) ke dalam akaun wanita berkenaan melalui sebuah bank di Mongolia.

Difahamkan, mengikut adat Mongolia, sekiranya lelaki dan wanita bersama dan mendapat anak hasil hubungan mereka, pasangan terbabit dianggap sudah menjadi suami isteri.”

Harian Metro 9 Nov: “Kebiasaannya, apabila Altantuya ingin ke negara ini, kata Syed Abdul Rahman, penganalisis itu akan bertemu dengannya di Shanghai sebelum membawanya masuk ke negara ini.

“Mereka akan menginap di hotel terkemuka di ibu negara setiap kali Altantuya berada di sini,” katanya.

Beliau mendakwa, penganalisis itu juga pernah berjanji untuk membelikan Altantuya sebuah rumah di negara ini sebagai tanda kasih mereka.

Syed Abdul Rahman berkata, hasil hubungan intim pasangan itu, mereka dikurniakan seorang anak lelaki berusia setahun empat bulan.”

Harian Metro 10 Nov: “Harian Metro difahamkan, mangsa dipercayai kali pertama memasuki Malaysia pada 2002 dan ketika itu hubungan pasangan berkenaan dikatakan baru berputik selepas penganalisis berkenaan pulang dari Mongolia.

Difahamkan, selain itu Altantuya … turut menyimpan gambar penganalisis terbabit ketika zaman mudanya.”

Utusan Malaysia 9 Nov: “Konsul Kehormat itu berkata, salah seorang sepupu mangsa yang menemuinya baru-baru ini mendakwa dia pernah menemui lelaki itu sebanyak dua kali iaitu di Starbucks di Shanghai dan Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf di Hong Kong.

Menurut Syed Abdul Rahman, semua maklumat yang diperoleh serta bukti yang dikemukakan oleh dua orang sepupu mangsa kepadanya, termasuk gambar lelaki tersebut, menunjukkan mereka memang mempunyai hubungan.”

Utusan 11 Nov: “Altantuya Shaariibuu dipercayai pernah datang ke Malaysia sebanyak lima kali dalam tempoh dua tahun ini.

Dalam lawatan pertamanya ke Malaysia pada 2 Mac tahun lalu, wanita yang berasal dari Ulan Bator, Mongolia itu pernah tinggal lebih seminggu di negara ini.

Bagaimanapun, dalam lawatan keempatnya pada 11 Ogos lalu, Altantuya hanya berada di negara ini tidak sampai 24 jam.

Difahamkan, Altantuya yang tiba di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Kuala Lumpur (KLIA) pada kira-kira pukul 12 tengah hari hari berkenaan telah meninggalkan KLIA pada kira-kira pukul 7.30 pagi keesokan harinya.

Menurut sumber, lawatan kedua mangsa ke Malaysia juga pada bulan Mac tahun lalu manakala lawatannya dua bulan selepas itu merupakan yang terakhir ke negara ini bagi tahun 2005.

Pada tahun ini, Altantuya telah direkod masuk ke Malaysia sebanyak dua kali iaitu pada 11 Ogos dan pada 8 Oktober lalu sebelum dilaporkan hilang pada 20 Oktober,’’ kata sumber itu ketika dihubungi di sini hari ini.”

Some papers went further claiming that the couple was actually married.

The Star 9 Nov: “The father of murdered model Altantuya Shaariibuu will come with documents to prove that she was married to the prominent political analyst, Mongolian honorary consul Datuk Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi said.

Syed Abdul Rahman, who is based here, said Altantuya's father would also be bringing his grandson for DNA tests to ascertain the identity of the father.

Altantuya's family claimed to have in their possession a valid marriage certificate, he said, adding that she might have converted to Islam in Mongolia.”

But this was later denied by Syed Abdul Rahman,

Harian Metro 10 Nov: “Selain itu, beliau meluahkan rasa kecewa kerana ada beberapa fakta lain yang tersalah lapor seperti status agama wanita itu serta kononnya pasangan berkenaan sudah berkahwin.

“Pasangan itu tidak pernah berkahwin ... Mengenai sijil perkahwinan, beliau turut menafikan ia ada dalam simpanan keluarga wanita itu kerana mereka tidak pernah melangsungkan perkahwinan.”

6. Sequence of Events:

It is impossible to gather from the newspapers what really happened. Newspapers reported different versions, and key facts were changed daily by these newspapers, almost always without citing sources. Below is the sequence of events:-

Oct 8: Arrived in Malaysia (Utusan 11 Nov). We based this on Utusan Malaysia, since they appear to have an Immigration source.

Q: Who did she arrive with?

Newspapers’ version differed. Some papers said she came with her sister and cousin (NST 7 Nov, NST 10 Nov, NST 15 Nov, The Sun 9 Nov, Harian Metro 12 Nov). Star 10 Nov reported this: “According to the Mongolian model’s report, they were alleged to have made the threats to her at 5am that day at Hotel Malaya where she was staying with her sister and cousin.”

But NST Nov 18 said “Amy and Ochir had accompanied Altantuya from Mongolia early last month.” NST Nov 18 claimed that Amy is Nirmalaa Gerelmaa, and that Amy and Ochir were the victim’s cousins.

Others said she came with her best friend, Namiraa Gerelmaa, 22 (Utusan 8 Nov). (Note that Namiraa Gerelmaa is recorded as the complainant in the subsequent court case, so she must be the one who made the eventual police report of Altantuya’s disappearance).

The Honorary Consul for Mongolia, though, told a different story, as reported in Harian Metro 8 Nov:

“Kehadiran Altantuya bersama seorang sepupunya, Galochir Uuriintuya, 29, ke negara ini pada 6 Oktober lalu untuk mengadu nasib dengan penganalisis terbabit yang dianggap ‘suaminya’ di samping ingin meminta wang bagi membiayai kos pembedahan yang bernilai AS$5,000 hingga AS$10,000 (RM19,000 hingga RM38,000).

Syed Abdul Rahman berkata, apabila Altantuya tidak pulang ke hotel, Galochir cuba membuat laporan di Ibu Pejabat Polis Brickfields tetapi gagal kerana dia tidak boleh berbahasa Inggeris dan terpaksa menghubungi sepupu mangsa, Namiraa Gerelmaa, 22, di Hong Kong bagi mendapatkan bantuan.

… Mereka berdua membuat laporan di balai polis sama keesokannya pada jam 11.48 malam dengan menyatakan Altantuya hilang dan khuatir akan keselamatannya. Galochir turut membuat laporan pada 28 Oktober lalu di balai polis sama memberitahu pasport antarabangsanya disimpan Altantuya kerana kehadirannya ke Malaysia dibiayai rakannya.”

Q: Why did she come to Malaysia?

The papers really went to town with this one.

Check this out from NST 7 Nov:

“Investigations are expected to cover various scopes, including the possibility that the strategist, well known on the international lecture circuit, fell victim to a US$500,000 (RM1.9 million) blackmail pulled off by the woman … investigators are now looking at the possibility that this "missing person" incident has brought them up against a sex-cum-blackmail scam whose players have international links.”

And this the day after:

“ (she) allegedly demanded US$500,000 (RM1.85 million) as payment after he signalled the end of their affair. She claimed that she had given birth to his child and threatened to go public if her demand was not met.” (NST 8 Nov)

NST 9 Nov: “Attantuya’s family says that she came to Malaysia to obtain money to treat her toddler son. But the political analyst alleges that a woman was extorting US$500,000 (RM1.82 million) from him and had harassed him with SMSes.”

However, the Star and Utusan never reported this 500,000USD extortion story.

Star 8 Nov: “It is learnt that Altantuya, mother of a 16-month-old baby boy, came to Malaysia to seek help and financial support from the analyst for the baby, who is in need of medical treatment.”

And according to Utusan 8 Nov, “Difahamkan, Altantuya yang ditemani rakan karibnya, Namiraa Gerelmaa, 22, datang ke Kuala Lumpur pada 6 Oktober lalu untuk menemui ‘suaminya’ yang sudah berkahwin dan mempunyai anak.”

As stated earlier, the Honorary Consul for Mongolia’s version was reported in Harian Metro 8 Nov:

“Kehadiran Altantuya … ke negara ini … untuk mengadu nasib dengan penganalisis terbabit yang dianggap ‘suaminya’ di samping ingin meminta wang bagi membiayai kos pembedahan yang bernilai AS$5,000 hingga AS$10,000 (RM19,000 hingga RM38,000).”

So, from the reports, it cannot be satisfactorily concluded why and with whom she came to Malaysia, although we can safely say that she came with her lady companion or companions with the objective of meeting Razak Baginda.

Oct 9: Altantuya and her lady companion or companions check into Hotel Malaya, Jalan Hang Lekir. (all reports)

Oct 10: She/they meet with private investigator to help her meet Razak Baginda. (NST 7 Nov, The Sun 9 Nov, Utusan 17 Nov, Harian Metro 9 Nov)

Oct 10-Oct 15: - She/they made numerous phone calls to the private investigator from their hotel rooms. (NST 7 Nov, Harian Metro 9 Nov)

- Private investigator met Razak Baginda at the latter’s office.

Oct 15: Razak Baginda filed two police reports against Altantuya and the private investigator (NST Nov 9). He alleged that he was being intimidated by certain individuals. (all newspapers)

Q: What did Razak say in the police reports?

We don’t know but the following news excerpts are interesting:-

NST 9 Nov: “His team of lawyers are arguing that he had no role in the murder …, had co-operated fully with investigators since his arrest and had lodged two police reports last month on being blackmailed by the woman. As such, he should not be held in remand for five days, as ordered by a magistrate’s court yesterday.”

NST 10 Nov: “Shafee is saying that the analyst has no role in the murder. He pointed out that his client had lodged two police reports last month, claiming that he was being blackmailed and harassed by the woman.”
Utusan 9 Nov: “Dalam laporan yang dibuat di Ibu Pejabat Polis (IPD) Brickfields di sini pada pertengahan Oktober lalu, pengarah eksekutif agensi pemikir itu mendakwa beliau telah diperas ugut oleh model itu sejak lebih setahun lalu.”

Before Oct 19: - Altantuya turns up at the building where the analyst’s office is housed but is turned away by a security guard. Allegedly told the guard to pass a message to the analyst, claiming that she had given birth to his child. (NST 8 Nov, The Sun 9 Nov, Metro 9 Nov)

- Razak Baginda hired private investigator(s) following contact(s) made by Altantuya/her private investigator (NST 10 Nov, Star 10 Nov)

Oct 19: - Altantuya lodged a police report at the Tun H.S. Lee Police Station at about 1 p.m., claiming that certain parties had threatened to throw her into jail. According to Altantuya’s report, the threats were made to her at 5 a.m. that day at Hotel Malaya. It is believed that those making the threats are the two PIs currently being remanded, or at least one of them. (Star Nov 10, Nov 17, Utusan 10 Nov)

The other events happening on October 19 had many different versions:-

NST 8 Nov:
“(Altantuya) and her sister turn up at the prominent personality’s home in Bukit Damansara in a taxi. A security consultant hired by the analyst allegedly stops her from entering the house, and warns her to leave. She persists. The security consultant threatens to call the police. She leaves in a taxi and returns to the hotel.

Several hours later, she leaves the hotel. That was the last time she was seen alive.”

The Sun 9 Nov:
“Altantuya and her cousin turn up at the analyst’s home in Damansara Height in a taxi. A security consultant hired by the analyst prevents them from entering the house and warns her to leave. She leaves and return to her hotel. Several hours later she leaves her hotel room.”

The Star 8 Nov:
“Altantuya managed to find out where the analyst lived but failed in her attempt to meet him until Oct 19 when she was said to have received a telephone call to meet him at his house.

She was said to have contacted her sister and cousin over the handphone, informing them that she had reached the analyst’s house.

While she was outside the house, she was seized by several men, pushed into a car and driven away.

Her sister and cousin, who last heard from her that night, became worried and sought the help of the Mongolian Embassy in Bangkok after they were told that there was no embassy or consul here.”

Utusan 10 Nov:
“Selepas 13 hari menanti, akhirnya pada 19 Oktober lalu, mangsa dijemput oleh seorang lelaki di hotel penginapannya di Jalan Hang Lekir di sini untuk bertemu ‘suaminya’.

Mangsa dilaporkan tidak kembali ke hotel keesokan harinya dan Namiraa yang gagal mengesan Altantuya telah bertindak melaporkan kehilangan wanita itu kepada Konsulat Mongolia di Thailand. “

Metro 9 Nov:
“Altantuya ditemani seorang saudaranya ke kediaman penganalisis politik itu di Bukit Damansara tetapi sekali lagi dihalang menemui lelaki itu.

Dia enggan berganjak bertemu lelaki itu tetapi selepas pegawai keselamatan mengatakan akan memanggil polis, mereka pulang semula ke hotel penginapan.

Bagaimanapun, beberapa jam kemudian, Atlantuya meninggalkan hotel penginapannya dipercayai ke kediaman penganalisis politik itu. Itulah kali terakhir, model sambilan itu dilihat.”

The same Harian Metro edition then proceeded to give a different story in a different article!

Metro 9 Nov:
“Syed Abdul Rahman berkata, kira-kira jam 7 malam pada 19 Oktober lalu, Altantuya menerima panggilan daripada seorang lelaki India bernama Bala yang memperkenalkan diri sebagai pengawal peribadi penganalisis terbabit.

Lelaki berkenaan memaklumkan VIP itu ingin menemui mangsa bagi membincang masalah mereka.

Mangsa yang kegembiraan terus mendapatkan teksi dan ke rumah ‘suaminya’ di Jalan Setia Jaya. Bagaimanapun, menurut pemandu teksi yang membawanya, mangsa ditarik seorang lelaki sebaik keluar dari kenderaan itu dan dibawa masuk ke sebuah Proton Wira merah.

Kereta itu bergerak ke kawasan tidak diketahui dengan diikuti sebuah jip Suzuki. Pemandu teksi yang masih belum menerima bayaran itu kemudian mendapatkan Bala lalu diberikan RM50. Dia kemudian diarah datang semula keesokannya bagi mendapatkan baki bayaran berikutan mangsa menggunakan teksinya selama sehari bagi mencari suaminya,” katanya.”

From the reports, there is no way we can say what happened on that fateful October 19. But what was constant in all the reports was that Altantuya left her hotel and took a taxi to go to Razak Baginda’s house. She never returned.

What we do know is that the charges against the two policemen was for having jointly murdered the 28-year-old freelance model between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20 at Lots 12843 and 16735 in Mukim Bukit Raja in Shah Alam.

So for Oct 19, the following events are added:-

Oct 19: - Altantuya left her hotel and took a taxi to go to Razak Baginda’s house. She never returned.

- Between 10pm that night and 1am the next morning (Oct 20) at Lots 12843 and 16735 in Mukim Bukit Raja in Shah Alam, in the darkness of the jungle and the night, she was jointly killed by Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, 30 and corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, 35 from the elite Special Action Force.


The rest of the events were well recorded and not disputed. So, after taking out all the deductions and discussions, we arrive at the following ‘clean’ sequence of events.

Oct 8:
Altantuya arrived in Malaysia

Oct 9:
Altantuya and her lady companion or companions check into Hotel Malaya, Jalan Hang Lekir. (all reports)

Oct 10:
She/they meet with private investigator to help her meet Razak Baginda. (NST 7 Nov, The Sun 9 Nov, Utusan 17 Nov, Harian Metro 9 Nov)

Oct 10-Oct 15:
- She/they made numerous phone calls to the private investigator from their hotel rooms. (NST 7 Nov, Harian Metro 9 Nov)

- Private investigator met Razak Baginda at the latter’s office.

Oct 15:
Razak Baginda filed two police reports against Altantuya and the private investigator (NST Nov 9). He alleged that he was being intimidated by certain individuals.

Before Oct 19:
- Altantuya turns up at the building where the analyst’s office is housed but is turned away by a security guard. Allegedly told the guard to pass a message to the analyst, claiming that she had given birth to his child. (NST 8 Nov, The Sun 9 Nov, Metro 9 Nov)

- Razak Baginda hired private investigator(s) following contact(s) made by Altantuya/her private investigator (NST 10 Nov, Star 10 Nov)

Oct 19:
- Altantuya lodged a police report at the Tun H.S. Lee Police Station at about 1 p.m., claiming that certain parties had threatened to throw her into jail. According to Altantuya’s report, the threats were made to her at 5 a.m. that day at Hotel Malaya. It is believed that those making the threats are the two PIs currently being remanded, or at least one of them. (Star Nov 10, Nov 17, Utusan 10 Nov)

- Altantuya left her hotel and took a taxi to go to Razak Baginda’s house. She never returned.

- Between 10pm that night and 1am the next morning (Oct 20) at Lots 12843 and 16735 in Mukim Bukit Raja in Shah Alam, in the darkness of the jungle and the night, she was jointly killed by Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, 30 and corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, 35 from the elite Special Action Force.

Oct 21:
Police report made by Altantuya’s companion(s) at the Hotel about her disappearance. They named Abdul Razak as being involved in the disappearance.

Oct 21-26:
Woman detective lance corporal detained to assist investigation.

26 Oct:
Chief Inspector Azilah detained to assist investigation.

6 Nov:
Corporal Sirul Azhar detained to assist investigation.

7 Nov:
Razak Baginda detained to assist investigation.

15 Nov:
- DNA test result confirmed that the remains found at the crime scene belong to Altantuya

- Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, 30 and corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, 35 are charged for having jointly murdered the 28-year-old freelance model between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20 at Lots 12843 and 16735 in Mukim Bukit Raja in Shah Alam under s 302 of the Penal Code read together with s 34 of the same.

- Woman detective lance corporal released on police bail.

16 Nov:
Razak Baginda charged of having abetted C/Insp Azilah Hadri and Kpl Sirul Azhar Umar to commit the murder of Altantuya between 9.54am and 11.05am on Oct 18 at Level 10, Bangunan Getah Asli, 148, Jalan Ampang, here - the official address of the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre, under s 109 of the Penal Code read together with Section 302 of the same code. If convicted, he will be sentenced to death.

18 Nov:
Altantuya’s father, relatives and monks carried out last rites for Altantuya’s soul at the crime scene at Puncak Alam.

23 Nov:
Razak Baginda pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. He was released on court bond for RM1 million.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

61% agree with ASLI's key finding

61% of Malaysia Tomorrow readers agreed with ASLI’s key finding that Bumiputeras now own 45% of equity in Malaysia's stock exchange despite various statements in the media that disputed the findings.

We posted the poll on 9 October 2006, when the issue was only coming out in the national newspapers. Throughout the next few weeks, the issue became the hottest issue in the news and was widely debated in the media. with ASLI finally retracting the report which contains the finding.

The poll was live for 30 days, from Monday 09 October 2006 to Tuesday 07 November 2006.

There was a technical glitch with the polling numbers, as the system states that 107 votes were returned but the voting columns showed that only 104 votes were recorded in the voting column. 3 votes were relegated to the Twilight Zone. So we have recounted the voting percentage, counting only the recorded 104 votes.

Technically, we allowed a voter to only vote once, as the poll would create a cookie stored in the voter’s PC or notebook which prevented him or her from voting twice.

Here is the question we posed and the choices we provided:-

Question:
Do you agree with Asian Strategy & Leadership Institute (ASLI)’s key finding that Bumiputeras now own 45% of equity in Malaysia's stock exchange?

Options:
1. Yes
2. No

From the 104 votes recorded, 61% answered yes. This is very surprising since there were numerous statements denying the figures made by national leaders. In fact the ASLI report which contains the finding was even at the end retracted by the research body.

A voter (salam_mesra@hotmail.com) posed a question: do the Malays realized that they are the malaysian americans?
Food for thought.



The setting for a recent elite Malay wedding


But many Malays still live like this

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Pejabat GERAK di pecah masuk !

16 Nov - Seluruh team GERAK yang baru pulang daripada Siri Jelajah Penerangan GERAK di Perlis, Kedah dan Penang awal pagi ini terkejut mendapati Pejabat GERAK telah dipecah masuk.

Kunci pintu hadapan pejabat telah dipecahkan. Semua laci – laci yang berkunci di pejabat GERAK juga telah dipecahkan anehnya tiada satu pun barang berharga yang hilang termasuk beberapa komputer riba (laptop) yang diletakkan dalam laci berkunci yang telah dipecahkan.

Siasatan awal mendapati hanya beberapa dokumen yang membabitkan rasuah hilang. Beberapa fail dan thumb drive juga turut hilang. Pihak keselamatan bangunan telah memulakan siasatan dan laporan polis telah pun dibuat pada jam 10.19 pagi ini di Balai Polis Kelana Jaya. Laporan bernombor K.Jaya/009097/06.

GERAK menyakini kejadian ini berkait langsung dengan laporan polis yang dibuat oleh yang membabitkan beberapa pemimpin utama negara dan ahli keluarga mereka termasuk Perdana Menteri dan anaknya Kamaluddin Abdullah dan kempen pendedahan serta penerangan GERAK yang berhubung perkara tersebut yang telah bermula sejak seminggu lalu.

GERAK akan terus menjalankan operasi di pejabat yang sama dan kejadian tersebut tidak menjejaskan tumpuan GERAK untuk terus berjuang memerangi rasuah.

Dalam perkembangan lain GERAK percaya kenyataan Presiden Umno dalam Perhimpunan Agung semalam yang kononnya bersungguh sungguh memerangi rasuah dan mengajak semua pihak membantunya merupakan satu kenyataan kosong dan retorik semata - mata. GERAK hanya percaya kepada komitmen Perdana Menteri untuk memerangi rasuah sekiranya beliau berani membuat pindaan perundangan di Parlimen untuk membebaskan Badan Pencegah Rasuah (BPR) dari struktur Jabatan Perdana Menteri itu sendiri dan meletakkan BPR terus di bawah Parlimen secara langsung.

GERAK ingin mengingatkan rakyat sepanjang 3 tahun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi menjadi Perdana Menteri (PM), tidak ada satu pun pindaan undang undang yang membabitkan akta rasuah dibuat untuk memperkasakan BPR.

GERAK yakin Abdullah telah berbohong kepada rakyat khususnya perwakilan Umno semalam. Berdasarkan pendedahan kes – kes korupsi mutakahir ini yang membabitkan salah guna kuasa beliau sendiri sebagai PM dalam memperkayakan anak dan menantu beliau, Abdullah sebenarnya tidak mempunyai kekuatan moral dan jati diri untuk memerangi rasuah.

GERAK menyeru Abdullah untuk secara jujur mengakui ketidak kemampuan beliau untuk melaksanakan tugas besar ini iaitu memerangi rasuah dan dengan ini mendesak beliau untuk meletakkan jawatan di akhir Perhimpunan Agung Umno kali ini.

p/s : apa yang nak di curi sebenarnya ?

What ASLI report ?




This is what I dig from the ASLI report:

• Although the equity holding by Bumiputera has declined, the volume of wealth may not necessarily decline.
• Although the Chinese owns more than 40% of corporate equity, the Chinese have learned to create smart partnerships with influential Bumiputeras to protect their interest. Conclusively, the Chinese do not own a substantial amou
nt of the economy as widely speculated.
• Market cap is not a true representation of wealth because of fluctuation of share prices. Private wealth must also be taken into consideration.
• The capital ownership of Bumiputera is 18.7%, which includes foreign interest of 28.8% and nominee companies of 9.2%. Not a true representation of ethic ownership. If these ownerships are taken out, Bumiputera equity holding is 30.2%.
• The decline of Chinese direct participation in sectors such banking, oil & gas, education and the more apparent presence of Bumiputera in key positions.
• The actual ownership of Bumiputera on the bourse is 45%, which means that the NEP has achieved its goal.
• ASLI has found that the NEP’s goal to nurture a selected few has failed.
• The NEP does not allow true entrepreneurial spirit and does not promote foreign investment.
• Non-Bumi
putera enterprises have cherished in Malaysia because they are open to competition during the NEP implementation.
• SMEs of all races must be developed.
• Malay agenda has to be replaced with Malaysian agenda to futher grow the economy.

It’s hard to argue with reports churned by established institutions. However, after reading this report, I think more than half of the report is just plain rubbish (Tan Sri Muhyiddin, you da man). When the report argues that the Bumiputera usually benefit from divesting interest during public offerings and channeling their wealth to other avenues such as real estates and trusts, we have to also measure what is the current volume owned by the Chinese. Amanah Saham Nasional is not the only trust agency in Malaysia! You want to compare apple to apple, let’s open up all the accounts in all financial bodies and look at the true volume.


One contradiction I find in this report is that first it talked about how the Chinese usually look for influential Malays as partners to protect their interest. Then it talked about the rise of smart partnerships between Chinese and the Melayu Baru especially in manufacturing that contributes to the economy. Which is which??? So first kutuk the Malays because the NEP has not worked, and then puji the Malays again because we’re afraid that the Malay political masters will whack us?

The decline of ownership in anchor banks by the Chinese needs to be looked at from the perspective of market penetration, not
ownership of individual banks. In other words, we don’t know whether 3 out of 10 banks are controlling the majority of the market or not.

It’s sick reading this report. It undermines the intelligence of the Malaysian community. I hope ASLI does not think that the Melayu Baru are as gullible or naïve. If we counter this report with another report, this will only start a chain reaction of academic discussions.

The MAJOR point of this whole issue is that we see the rise of the Chinese trying to speak up more about Malay rights in our Tanah Melayu or ‘Malay’sia. What are we going to do about it fellow Melayu Baru or Lama?????



ASLI's Major Finding

• The ownership of Bumiputera equity is largely contributed by participation of GLCs
• Corporate growth through debt was Government’s main strategy prior to 1997 crisis. Bumiputeras running large conglomerates took a big fall after.
• There is a new breed of Bumiputera from the middle class with sound education and access to human development opportunities to climb up in the private sector.

ASLI believes that the Government’s intention to redistribute wealth through affirmative action may jeopardize economic growth. ASLI says that the Government should focus on the growth of SMEs in the Ninth Malaysia Plan to promote genuine entrepreneurial capacity.

The objective of the NEP was to eradicate identification of race by economic functions. The NEP was to increase the economic ownership ration of 2.4:33:63 (Malay:Chinese:Indian) to 30:40:30. However, the Government was unclear of the method to be used to redistribute wealth. This would suggest that should one Bumiputera hold most of the 30% and other Bumiputera hold little or nothing, the goal would have been achieved. Following the implementation of this policy, the Bumiputera equity increased from 2.4% in 1970 to 18.7% in 2004 through GLCs and Government agencies. ASLI believes that the 18.7 percentage is deceiving.

The Malaysian Government through its numerous trust agencies and GLCs such as Khazanah, Petronas, PNB, MOF and others have acquired equity in companies as investment. Most are now major equity shareholders in these companies. The acquisition exercise includes participation by various State Economic Development Corporations (SEDC).

The Government has also used Bursa Malaysia as a platform to increase Bumiputera equity. During Tun Mahathir’s premiership in 1981, Tun Mahathir was of the opinion that the stock market was the avenue to create wealth for the Bumiputera by selectively choosing a small group of Malay businessmen and enabling them to use government-linked assets into the stock market. This resulted in swift corporate growth.

Another method was privatization. This involved the sale of government entities to selected Bumiputera businessmen. This resulted in a massive increase of Bumiputera equity in the early 1990s.

Legislation and enforcement agencies were established to maintain to enforce equity distribution among ethnic communities such as the Industrial Co-ordination Act 1975 and Securities Commission and Capital Issues Committee. The regulation includes a minimum equity holding of 30% by Bumiputera. MIT was responsible to ensure that companies going for listing either sell 30% of the equity to approved Bumiputera companies or 30% of the paid up capital is already owned by Bumiputera before listing.

Through these mechanisms, Bumiputera equity increased from 2.4% in 1973 to 20.6% in 1995 and 18.7% in 2004. Chinese equity went from 27.2% to 40.9% in 2004. In terms of value, Bumiputera held equity amounting to RM73.2billion in 2004 compared to RM447 million in 1970.

However, many recipients of share equity divested their interest for a huge profit. Much of the proceeds are rechanneled to Government trust agencies which provide a return of 12-18% per annum, much higher that commercial banks fixed deposits of 3-4%.

Some divestment found its way into the property sector. Value of properties owned by Bumiputera especially in prime areas have appreciated considerably. Bumiputera also enjoy discounts from purchase of real estates. Although the equity holding by Bumiputera has declined, the volume of wealth may not necessarily declined.

A survey of market capitalization of top companies in Bursa Malaysia done in 1993 indicated that the Government owns 40.5% of this equity. Another report indicated GLCs’ market cap amounted to RM260billion, or 36% of total market cap.

Although the Chinese owns more than 40% of corporate equity, the Chinese have learned to create smart partnerships with influential Bumiputeras to protect their interest. Conclusively, the Chinese do not own a substantial amount of the economy as widely speculated.

There is also a dispute in the NEP figures, that the true Bumiputera ownership of equity is 50%, according to Ramon Navaratnam. This is because equity owned by politicians in UMNO and other influential figures are hidden in nominee companies to conceal from scrutiny.

Bumiputera apportioned stock during public offerings are usually sold for a profit. The companies involved need to maintain the 30% Bumiputera equity as part of regulation. This means that although the Bumiputera ownership is seen to have dropped, the actual volume has increased.

Incentives and privileges for Bumiputera are prone to abuse. The access to wealth is usually privileged to middle and upper class Bumiputera, thus hindering the under-priveleged Bumiputera to improve their standard of living. Equitable distribution of wealth can only be done effectively if distributed based on income level.

The regulation of ensuring 30% of Bumiputera equity in foreign companies wanting to conduct business in Malaysia hinders foreign investment. This does not allow the company to truly reflect its true fund raising ability because of this artificial requirement. Not only that, hypermarkets are instructed to have 30% of their shelves allotted for Bumiputera SMEs. Numerous foreign companies are not keen of such regulation.

Bumiputera presence is also more apparent in emerging sectors, such as oil & gas, finance, banking and education. The staffing for big enterprises are usually Bumiputera. A number of large firms originally owned by foreigners or non-Bumi are now owned by Bumiputera or government control such as United Asian Bank, MISC, UMW, NSTP, MMC, Sime Darby, Golden Hope, UEM, Guthrie and others.

Bumiputera presence in executive positions is also more apparent especially in large enterprises such as PETRONAS, MAS and Maybank.

A huge decline of influence of non-Bumiputera is in the banking sector. Because of consolidation exercise, numerous non-Bumiputera-owned banks were under the direct control of less enterprising banks owned by Bumiputera, despite public outcry. Now there are only 3 Chinese-owned anchor banks. Among the ten anchor banks, the Government and Bumiputera own the rest of them.

The conventional method of Government’s initiative to boost up Bumiputera equity ownership through debt has taken a tremendous backlash, in particular, after the economic crash in 1997.

There is also an encouraging increase of inter-ethnic partnership since the 90’s. Because the NEP has so far uplifted the Bumiputera status and the creation of more well-educated middle and upper-class Bumiputera, Bumiputeras now are at par and have the ability to compete better. This now wealthier and smart Bumiputera are creating smart partnerships with non-Bumiputera especially in the area of manufacturing, suggesting that the trend of ‘Ali-Baba’ alliances are diminishing and a more productive business partnerships are being created.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Umno punca virus Rasuah

KUALA LUMPUR, 3 Nov (Hrkh) - Rasuah dan penyalahgunaan kuasa begitu sinonim dengan Umno dan hakikat ini turut dipersetujui beberapa pimpinan parti itu yang sedang berkhidmat dengan kerajaan dan yang telah meninggalkan kerajaan.

Terbaru, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Dato' Seri Mohammed Nazri Aziz dalam satu kupasannya yang disiar weblog Malaysia-today antara lain bersetuju dengan pandangan bahawa ahli Umno memang kebal dari sudut rasuah dan undang-undang.

Mengulas kenyataan itu, Gerakan Demokrasi dan Anti-Korupsi (GERAK) bersetuju dengan kenyataan Mohammed Nazri yang menyatakan ahli Umno kebal daripada tindakan undang undang dan rasuah kerana Umno diterajui oleh Presiden yang juga Perdana Menteri.

Perdana Menteri menjadikan Badan Pencegah Rasuah (BPR) di bawah bidang kuasanya sendiri yang akhirnya menjadikan badan itu tidak bebas kerana pertimbangan politik presidennya, kata Penyelaras Eksekutif GERAK, Badrul Hisham Shaharin.

"Rasuah sememangnya penyakit dalam Umno dan kerajaan tetapi mereka seolah-olah kebal daripada pendakwaan dan penguatkuasaan kerana penguasaan politik dan BPR yang tidak bebas dan jika ada pendakwaan atau tindakan ke atas mana-mana ahli Umno kerana rasuah itupun dilakukan berdasarkan tindakan politik," katanya.

Sebagai contoh kes membabitkan bekas Menteri Wilayah Persekutuan, Tan Sri Isa Samad yang dikenakan tindakan penggantungan kerana rasuah wang dalam pemilihan Umno.

Tindakan dibuat bukan kerana Isa bersalah, dan hampir semua ahli Umno tahu dan faham untuk memenangi apa jua jawatan khususnya diperingkat Pusat, rasuah pasti menjadi syarat kemenangan.

Bagaimanapun kata Badrul Hisham, hanya Isa dikenakan tindakan kerana pergeseran kem politik dalaman Umno itu sendiri.

Dalam kes ini Umno sudah tentu takut membuka pintu kepada BPR untuk masuk menyiasat kes tersebut kerana jika badan itu dibenarkan melakukan siasatan terbuka, nescaya hampir semua mereka yang bertanding akan dikenakan tindakan, katanya lagi.

"Malah semua perwakilan juga akan dikenakan tindakan kerana menerima, memberi dan meminta rasuah juga merupakan satu kesalahan mengikut definasi BPR," katanya.

Berhubung komen Mohammed Nazri yang menyatakan masalah dalaman Umno dan tidak bersangkutan dengan pentadbiran dan perundangan negara, GERAK berpendirian hujah itu sangat lemah dan dangkal.

"Umno parti pemerintah, sudah tentu rasuah dan penyelewengan dalam Umno melibatkan mereka yang memegang jawatan penting dalam kerajaan. Sudah tentu mereka menggunakan 'kemudahan dan kelebihan' mereka menduduki kerusi penting kerajaan untuk membolehkan mereka menjalankan jenayah tersebut.

"Maka rasuah dalaman Umno yang yang menjadi tradisi inilah yang menyebabkan punca kegiatan jenayah rasuah yang semakin tidak terbendung dalam kerajaan dan negara ini," katanya.

"Jika rasuah itu penyakit, Umno adalah punca pembawa virus rasuah dalam negara," katanya.

Justeru, GERAK mendesak Abdullah Badawi yang dikatakan menjalankan kempen antirasuah, serius dalam kempen antirasuahnya.

"Abdullah perlu berani membebaskan BPR daripada bawah cengkaman Presiden Umno dan meletakkan BPR bertanggungjawab penuh di bawah Parlimen," katanya. - lanh

AMKNS anjur dialog ekonomi dan pelancaran dana pilihan raya

KUALA LUMPUR, 31 Okt (Hrkh) - Angkatan Muda KeADILan Negeri Sembilan (AMKNS) akan mengadakan dialog ekonomi dan pelancaran dana Pilihan Raya ke-12 pada 26 November ini di Dewan Sekolah Tinggi Chung Hwa, Seremban.

Menurut Setiausaha AMKNS, Amiruddin Wahab, dialog ekonomi dan pelancaran dana pilihan raya itu akan diadakan setelah melihat kelembapan dan kemelesetan ekonomi yang semakin meruncing kini.

Menurutnya, hampir seruluh rakyat mula merasa kesannya malah rakyat kini menanti satu penyelesaian jelas untuk membawa negara keluar dari kemelut ini, katanya.

Isu ini perlu diberi perhatian khusus menjelang pilihan raya ini yang semakin dekat, katanya kepada Harakahdaily hari ini.

Menginsafi perkembangan yang menghimpit rakyat itu maka AMKNS akan menganjurkan program untuk menjelaskan isu ekonomi dan ke arah persiapan pilihanraya dengan membariskan panelis
seperti Presiden KeADILan, Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail; Pengerusi Gerakan Demokrasi dan Anti Korupsi (Gerak), Mohamed Ezam Mohd Noor; serta Bendahari KeADILan, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

Program julung kali itu akan bermula pada jam 3.00 petang hingga 7.00 petang dengan ucaptamanya akan disampaikan oleh Dr Wan Azizah.AMKNS menjemput seluruh pejuang reformasi dan rakyat mengikuti program tersebut yang akan menjanjikan pengetahuan bermakna kepada membina minda masyarakat, katanya.

Bagi yang berminat menyertai program ini boleh mendapatkan tiket dengan menghubungi Azizi (012-369 6474) sebelum 24 November ini, katanya.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

FAKIR MISKIN : AMNS AKAN TEMUI MAINS DAN JKM NS

Angkatan Muda keADILan Negeri Sembilan (AMNS) akan memohonan temujanji untuk menemui Pengarah MAINS dan JKM NS untuk membincangkan isu fakir miskin di negeri ini.

Perjumpaan ini untuk membincangkan prosedur sebenar penyaluran bantuan dan kelayakan penerima bantuan dari kedua dua badan berkenaan, selain dari menyerahkan senarai fakir miskin yang telah di temui sepanjang jejak fakir AMNS yang diadakan sepanjang ramadhan lepas.

AMNS memohon untuk pertemuan tersebut di adakan sesegera mungkin kerana ada antara mereka yang kita senaraikan itu amat memerlukan bantuan segera, malah ada antara mereka gagal menghantar anak ke sekolah kerana kesempitan hidup.

Seperti Puan Salmah, dari Chuah, (Lukut, Port Dickson) seorang saudara baru yang di nafikan sebarang bantuan kerana tidak menghadiri kelas fardu ain amat mengecewakan. Dari tinjauan kami kegagalan puan salmah dan anaknya yang baru memeluk Islam bukan di sengajakan tetapi kerana kesempitan hidup malah tambang untuk menghadiri kelas juga tidak ada. Anak beliau juga tidak ke sekolah. Perkara ini tidak akan berlaku jika sistem pematauan bantuan dapat di pertingkatkan.

Malah amat memeranjatkan apabila AMNS melakukan lawatan ke rumah keluarga yang diberikan bantuan oleh agensi seperti Baitulmal Negeri Sembilan keadaan keluarga tersebut memiliki keperluan seperti kereta, motosikal, televisyen besar dan lain lain lagi. Dalam keadaan itu masih banyak pula bilangan keluarga miskin tegar yang memerlukan bantuan terbiar tidak mendapat bantuan.

Sepanjang bulan Ramadhan yang lepas AMNS telah melancarkan gerakan kebenaran dan kesedaran sempena ramadhan. Dalam kempen itu amns telah berjaya mengedarkan 50, 000 risalah mendedahkan penyelewengan dana khas yang sepatutnya digunakan untuk membantu rakyat miskin. Sebanyak RM 1 bilion wang rakyat miskin telah disalahgunakan oleh kerjaaan umno. Malah di negeri sembilan Menteri Besar telah menyelewengkan RM 4.5 juta wang rakyat miskin untuk mengubah suai rumahnya yang baru satu tahun siap. Jumlah wang yang banyak juga dibazirkan untuk membeli perabot pejabat kerajaan dan menempah iklan sambutan pemimpin. AMNS amat kesal dengan penyelewengan ini. Ternyata Menteri Negeri Sembilan yang berwajah kononya seorang tokoh korporat yang prihatin masalah rakyat tetapi ternyata menyeleweng dan membazirkan wang rakyat.

Dalam kempen yang sama juga di adakan program jejak fakir di mana AMNS menjejak golongan fakir untuk diberikan bantuan sebanyak 237 buah keluarga untuk diberikan bantuan namun kerana kekangan kewangan amns Cuma berjaya menyampaikan bantuan kepada 56 buah keluarga. Bantuan dalam bentuk barang makanan, bantuan kewangan dan baju raya ini di perolehi dari sumbangan ahli keADILan dan sumbangan orang ramai termasuk dalam bentuk Zakat, Fitrah dan Fidyah. Untuk itu kami mengucapkan terima kasih atas kesudian orang ramai menyalurkan bantuan. Insya Allah semua sumbangan tidak akan kami sia siakan.

Atas kejayaan program ini amns akan meneruskan program bantuan ini dengan program jom ke sekolah. Program jom ke sekolah ini akan di lancarkan untuk membantu anak – anak fakir miskin ini membeli peralatan dan keperluan sekolah.

Memang benar, yuran peperiksaan sekolah di mansuhkan tapi bagaimana dengan yuran sampingan seperti yuran majlis sukan, pibg, yuran kertas peperiksaan percubaan dan seumpamanya. Malah bagaimana mereka ini mungkin berdepan dengan pakaian sekolah dan peralatan sekolah yang semakin mahal. Kami merayu bagi pihak anak – anak keluarga miskin ini , kepada mereka yang berkemampuan sudilah membantu dengan menghulurkan bantuan dalam bentuk kewangan, peralatan sekolah dan seumpamanya. Sebarang bantuan bolehlah disalurkan dengan menghubungi ; Badrul 017 6688404 @ Azizi 012 3696474.

Janji Angkatan Muda keADILan Malaysia meneruskan tekad memperjuangkan rakyat terbanyak !

Kenyataan Media ;
BADRUL HISHAM SHAHARIN
Pengarah Gerakan Kebenaran dan Kesedaran Sempena Ramadhan 1427 Angkatan Muda keADILan Negeri Sembilan Merangkap
Pengerusi Biro Bencana dan hal Ehwal Masyarakat Angkatan Muda Malaysia.

Monday, October 30, 2006

HARI RAYA EIDULFITR 2

CHICKEN RENDANG AND KUAH KACANG

marinade chickenstir untill dryalmost readynext is Kuah Kacang (made from coconut milk, chilli and ground nut)
at my Mom sister house


MY SWEET HOME....
Pic of my sweet simple home ( opss...my parent home...)

when all cabinet full of cookies

Dining Table....

Living Room

My mom picture and my picture when my graduation day on my mom bed room

HARI RAYA EIDULFITR 1

EIDULFITR WITH REVLON


One box enough for the head.

My sister.....


My cousin ... Anies

and..... my self also ....

Thursday, October 19, 2006

AMNS sampaikan bantuan kepada 16 fakir di Teluk Kemang

Oleh Wan Nordin Wan Yaacob
KUALA LUMPUR, 19 Okt (Hrkh) - Sinar 1 Syawal semakin hampir, dan ketika inilah segala persiapan terakhir bagi menyambut hari kemenangan umat Islam yang berpuasa dipergiatkan.
Ketika ini juga, yang kaya dan miskin saling bantu membantu, yang fakir menerima sementara yang kaya memberi, zakat dihulur derma disalur semata-mata untuk melihat hari raya Aidilfitri dirai bersama.
Pada 15 Oktober lalu, Angkatan Muda KeADILan Negeri Sembilan (AMKNS) telah menyampaikan bantuan kepada 16 keluarga fakir di Parlimen Teluk Kemang, Port Dickson (PD) dalam satu program pelancaran 'Jejak Fakir'.
Program tersebut dijalankan AMKNS sebagai sebahagian besar program menyambut Ramadan, kata pengarah program, Badrul Hisham Shaharin ketika mengadakan sidang media selepas program di Port Dickson. Program tersebut dimulakan dengan konvoi yang disertai 11 kenderaan termasuk sebuah lori mengangkut barang-barang bantuan yang hendak disampaikan kepada fakir miskin, kata Badrul Hisham. Bantuan telah disampaikan Pengerusi Perhubungan KeADILan Negeri Sembilan, Dr Ahmad Azam yang sekali gus melancarkan konvoi bantuan. Program turut disertai Naib ketua AMK Malaysia, Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, Exco AMK, Zarerah Hanim Mohd Zaki, Ketua AMKNS, Arifin Berham.

Cina Muslim tidak dapat bantuan zakat?
Apa yang menariknya rumah pertama yang dilawati AMKNS untuk diberikan bantuan ialah rumah sebuah keluarga Cina yang susah di kawasan Kampung Chuah, kata Badrul Hisham. Rumah keluarga ini didiami oleh seorang ibu (68 tahun), seorang anak lelaki 38 tahun (sakit mental) dan seorang anak perempuan (ibu tunggal) 35 tahun dengan lima orang anak, katanya. Ketika bantuan disampaikan, AMKNS diberitahu bahawa salah serang ahli keluarga Cina tersebut, Tan Chong Yin merupakan saudara baru yang memeluk Islam pada tahun 2004 dengan nama Islamnya Salmah Abdullah, kata Badrul Hisham.
Tambahnya, bukan setakat Salmah sahaja yang memeluk Islam, malah anaknya, Goh Chin Kiat turut diajak memeluk Islam tahun ini, katanya. "Beliau memutuskan ingin masuk Islam kerana tertarik dengan cerita kawan-kawan Islamnya mengenai Islam, tetapi malangnya sehingga hari ini beliau tidak pernah tahu mengenai Islam dengan lebih lanjut. Beliau terpaksa bergelut dengan kehidupan susah tanpa bantuan walaupun beliau layak menerima zakat dan bantuan Baitulmal," katanya Menurut Badrul Hisham, pejabat agama hanya akan memberi bantuan jika Salmah hadir kelas fardu ain yang ditetapkan, sedangkan Salmah tidak dapat hadir kerana desakan hidup tatkala terpaksa bekerja keras umpama 'kais pagi makan pagi kais petang makan petang', katanya.
Terlalu banyak orang fakir yang tidak menerima bantuan dikesan dalam konvoi tersebut, malah dari senarai pejabat agama yang diperolehi setelah di siasat tidak ramai, dakwanya.

Penyelewengan dana bantuan orang miskin?
Selain itu AMKNS melahirkan rasa kesal, terhadap sikap Menteri Besar Negeri Sembilan, Dato' Seri Mohammad Hassan kerana dalam keadaan ramai rakyat negeri ini yang susah, Mohammad terus membazirkan wang bantuan Dana Orang Miskin untuk perkara yang tidak mendatangkan faedah kepada rakyat, dakwa Badrul Hisham.
Antara pembaziran yang didakwa berlaku ialah, kerja-kerja ubah suai rumah Menteri Besar yang baru dua tahun siap dengan belanja RM4.5 juta, sedangkan ramai anak-anak yang tidak dapat pergi ke sekolah kerana masalah kemiskinan, katanya.

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

From the Sun

PETALING JAYA: An inquiry into alleged police violence during a demonstration heard a witness testify that he was hit with a jet of water and dragged to a Black Maria by no fewer than five policemen.

Parti Keadilan Rakyat deputy youth chief Badrul Hisham Shaharin said he was then handcuffed to another person and taken to the Jalan Hang Tuah police station (formerly Pudu Prison).

He gave evidence yesterday at the start of an eight-day hearing conducted by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) into the "Bloody Sunday" incident of May 28 against fuel price hikes.

Badrul said he was standing beside DAP leader Ronnie Liu that day. He said before that, he had signalled to a policeman standing above the water cannon truck to give the demonstrators five minutes to disperse. He said he was given a thumbs-up, but two minutes later he was hit by the water jet.

"I could not hear the three warnings given to us to disperse as it was inaudible and given at the same time when Ronnie was speaking over the loud-hailer," said Badrul.

In the Black Maria, Badrul said he saw Keadilan deputy secretary-general Zahir Hassan, who was bleeding from the mouth, nose and cheeks.

Badrul acknowledged that there were some police officers who showed concern and wanted to help.

The protest was organised by a coalition of NGOs, Keadilan, Parti Sosialis Malaysia, PAS, and university students, under the group name Protes.

Apart from Badrul, Keadilan information bureau chief Chua Tian Chang and Federal Reserve Unit cameraman L/Cpl Mohd Nasarudin Hashim also testified yesterday.

Suhakam's panel comprised commissioners Datuk Dr Michael Yeoh, Datin Paduka Zaitoon Othman and Datuk Choo Siew Kion. It was chaired by Datuk K.C. Vohrah.

Chua testified that the warnings to disperse was issued 15 minutes after the speeches started. He said he moved closer to the water cannon truck as he could not hear the announcement being made above the speeches and the crowd's cheering.

The inquiry viewed a tape recording made by Mohd Nasarudin.

The hearing continues.

http://www.thesundaily.com/article.cfm?id=15728

Saturday, October 14, 2006

SUHAKAM INQ' DAY ONE

SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS

Today (5 October 2006) is the 1st day of the inquiry. The inquiry will continue on the following days:
October 6, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 & 18

Members of the Panel:

v
Dato’ K.C. Vohrah (Chairperson)

v Dato’ Choo Siew Kioh

v Dato’ Dr. Michael Yeoh

v Datin Paduka Zaitoon Dato’ Othman

Venue:

SUHAKAM Inquiry Room, Level 29, Menara Tun Razak, Jalan Raja Laut, KL.

Background of the incident:
In protest to the sharp fuel price hike, three peaceful protests had been organized by a number of NGOs, political p
arties and the MTUC (Malaysia Trade Union Congress) on 3rd, 10th and 26th of March 2006 in front of the KLCC. On the 26th of March, the police dispersed the peaceful crowd violently and arrested 22 protestors. Many protestors were injured due to police brutality. A complaint was submitted to SUHAKAM on 31 March 2006.

On 28 May 2006, the Coalition to Protest Fuel Price Hike (PROTES) once again organized a demonstration in front of KLCC to voice the plights of all Malaysians wh
o are heavily burdened by the fuel price and electricity tariff hike. Unfortunately, the peaceful assembly was dispersed by the police with brute force and excessive violence. 20 people were arrested, including one minor. Many protestors were beaten and kicked by the Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) personnel. Several protestors were badly injured. The tragic day was dubbed “Bloody Sunday”.

After filing complaint to SUHAKAM, civil society groups made numerous efforts to urge SUHAKAM to hold public inquiry on police brutality in the aforesaid demonstration. After a long wait, SUHAKAM has finally agreed to hold a public inquiry into the incident.

Watching Brief with Observer Status:
1. Sivarasa Rasiah - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)

2. Amer Hamzah - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)
3. Edmund Bon - Bar Council


Watching brief:
1. M. Moganambal - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)
2. R. Ragunanthanan - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)
3. Ramesh - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)

4. Latheefa Koya - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)
5. Stephanie Bastian - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)
6. Sheena - Bar Council Legal Aid Centre (KL)
7. Chang Lih Kang - SUARAM

Today’s witnesses:

  1. Chua Tian Chang
  2. Badrul Hisham bin Shaharin (cheGuBard)
  3. Lance Corporal Mohd Nasarudin Hashim

Police’s Video Confirmed that the Assembly was Peaceful

After allowing lawyers to assist in the inquiry, Dato’ K.C. Vohrah, the chairperson of the inquiry panel kicked off the inquiry by calling the first witness, Chua Tian Chang (hereinafter referred to as Tian). Tian was one of the main organizers and he is now the Information Chief of Parti Keadilan Rakyat.

1st witness: I saw a pool of blood on the ground. Police should have learnt from other ASEAN countries

Tian was asked about the overall situation on the day of the demonstration. The inquiry panel inquired in detail on the incident. The inquiry panel also asked some questions about the Anti Fuel Price Hike Coalition – PROTES. Tian has given the SUHAKAM panel a full picture of the incident.

According to Tian, there was a heavy police presence on the day of the protest. The organizer has made it crystal clear that the demonstration on 28 May will be the last of the series of anti fuel price hike protests. Tian also told the inquiry panel that Dr. Hatta, the coordinator of the anti fuel price hike coalition (PROTES) had
also reiterated this message in his speech on the day of assembly.

Besides, Tian told the inquiry panel that he could not hear the OCPD when the officer warned the crowd by using loud hailer. It was due to the noises caused by the helicopter and the warning was given when sp
eaker, Ronnie Liu was delivering his speech. Tian told the inquiry panel that he saw a pool of blood on the ground after the police had left the scene. Towards the end of his testimony, Tian criticised the police for being selective in allowing public assemblies. He told the inquiry panel that the Malaysian police should have learnt from other ASEAN countries on how to handle big crowd, especially when the ASEAN Police Conference has just concluded.

2nd witness: Water cannon hit me on my stomach, and I was dragged rudely by the police

Second witness was Badrul Hisham Shaharin, the coordinator of an anti-corruption organization, GERAK. Badrul Hisham Shaharin (hereinafter referred to as Badrul) was the emcee of the assembly on 28 May. He was eventually arrested by the police.

Badrul told the inquiry panel that he was the one who started off the assembly. After a short introduction, he then passed t
he microphone to the coordinator of the assembly, Dr. Hatta to deliver his speech. Badrul recalled, Dr. Hatta only spoke for a very short while and the second speaker took over. When the third speaker, Ronnie Liu was speaking, Badrul heard some noise from the police but he could not hear clearly what the OCPD was trying to address. He thought the OCPD might be requesting the crowd to disperse, so he tried to communicate with the OCPD through sign language. After some exchanges, he was made to understand that the police was giving them another 5 minutes. Unfortunately, water cannon were unleashed from the truck after hardly two minutes.

The water cannon hit Badrul on his stomach and he fell to the ground because of the force. He was immediately surrounded by 5 to 6 police personnel and was rudely dragged for some 30 yards. According to Badrul, his pants were torn due to the crass dragging. He was then handcuffed and placed into the paddy wagon. He saw Zahir Hassan, the deputy secretary general of Parti Keadilan Rakyat in the wagon. Zahir was badly injured and his mouth was seen bleeding.

Badrul told the inquiry panel that he was not prosecuted to date.

3rd witness: The video was not doctored

The third witness of the inquiry is Lance Corporal Mohd Nasarudin Hashim. Mohd Nasarudin Hashim (hereinafter referred to as Nasarudin) is a FRU personnel, who was instructed to record video during the 28 May assembly. Nasarudin told the inquiry panel that the FRU commander who instructed him was Chief Inspector Pusparajen.

Nasarudin also told the inquiry that Chief Inspector Pusparajen did not direct him to film any specific scene. He testified that the video was not doctored.

The 17-min video was played at the inquiry. The video has clearly shown that the gathering was peaceful until the police acted.

The inquiry adjourned at around 4:30pm and further questions will be asked of Nasarudin on the next inquiry date.

Representatives of the FRU, police and Attorney-General’s Chamber were invited by SUHAKAM as observer but were not present today
.

Prepared by,

Chang Lih Kang

Monday, October 09, 2006

Latest : Haze - 13 areas declared 'unhealthy'

The air quality continued to deteriorate in the peninsular today after a brief respite over the weekend.

The Air Pollutant Index (API) for Negeri Sembilan’s Nilai - located near the Kuala Lumpur International Airport - was close to the ‘very unhealthy’ level this morning.

As of 11am, the API reading for Nilai was at 194, said a Department of Environment (DOE) spokesperson when contacted.

He said that the DOE’s website, which provides daily API readings taken at 11am and 5pm, has been experiencing high traffic congestion over the past few days.

API readings between 101-200 is considered ‘unhealthy’ while those between 201-300 is ‘very unhealthy’. Between 0-50 is ‘good’ and 51-100 ‘moderate’.

In total, 14 areas were declared ‘unhealthy’ this morning while 30 were ‘moderate’ and seven ‘good’.

But after a cloud-seeding induced shower this afternoon, there has been a slight drop in the API readings.

Nilai still registered the highest reading in air pollution with 173 as of 5pm.

The number of 'unhealthy' areas dropped marginally from 14 to 13, but 'moderate' areas increased from 30 to 33, while 'good' areas dropped from seven to four.

In the ‘unhealthy’ category were Perak's Seri Manjung (183 at 11am to 163 at 5pm), Kuala Selangor (181 to 165), Seremban (181 to 158), Putrajaya (171 to 156), Kuala Lumpur (159 to 155), Kajang (158 to 145), Shah Alam (145 to 140), Petaling Jaya (139 to 132), Port Klang (131 to 121), Malacca's Bukit Rambai (131 to 110), Gombak (127 to 128), Ipoh (113 to 105) and Malacca town (110 to 86). Sarawak, which was worst hit by the haze last week with several areas seeing their API readings exceed 200, was no longer in the ‘unhealthy’ zone today.

Friday, October 06, 2006

Witness: I was dragged to van and handcuffed

An inquiry into alleged police violence during a demonstration heard a witness testify that he was hit with a jet of water and dragged to a Black Maria by no fewer than five policemen.

Parti Keadilan Rakyat deputy youth chief Badrul Hisham Shaharin said he was then handcuffed to another person and taken to the Jalan Hang Tuah police station (formerly Pudu Prison).

He gave evidence yesterday at the start of an eight-day hearing conducted by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) into the "Bloody Sunday" incident of May 28 against fuel price hikes.

Badrul said he was standing beside DAP leader Ronnie Liu that day. He said before that, he had signalled to a policeman standing above the water cannon truck to give the demonstrators five minutes to disperse. He said he was given a thumbs-up, but two minutes later he was hit by the water jet.

"I could not hear the three warnings given to us to disperse as it was inaudible and given at the same time when Ronnie was speaking over the loud-hailer," said Badrul.

In the Black Maria, Badrul said he saw Keadilan deputy secretary-general Zahir Hassan, who was bleeding from the mouth, nose and cheeks.

Badrul acknowledged that there were some police officers who showed concern and wanted to help.

The protest was organised by a coalition of NGOs, Keadilan, Parti Sosialis Malaysia, PAS, and university students, under the group name Protes.

Apart from Badrul, Keadilan information bureau chief Chua Tian Chang and Federal Reserve Unit cameraman L/Cpl Mohd Nasarudin Hashim also testified yesterday.

Suhakam's panel comprised commissioners Datuk Dr Michael Yeoh, Datin Paduka Zaitoon Othman and Datuk Choo Siew Kion. It was chaired by Datuk K.C. Vohrah.

Chua testified that the warnings to disperse was issued 15 minutes after the speeches started. He said he moved closer to the water cannon truck as he could not hear the announcement being made above the speeches and the crowd's cheering.

The inquiry viewed a tape recording made by Mohd Nasarudin.

The hearing continues.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Seremban (my home town) 'unhealthy' areas !?!

Unhealthy air quality has been recorded in more areas in the country as the haze situation deteriorated today.

The areas which recorded the latest Air Pollutant Index (API) exceeding 100 have risen from 11 yesterday to 15 as at 11am today, a Department of Environment spokesperson told malaysiakini.

(The department’s website, detailing API readings on a daily basis, has been experiencing technical problems since this morning.)

The four new 'unhealthy' areas are all in the peninsula - Kuala Selangor (111), Muar (110), Seri Manjung (107) and Bandar Raya Melaka (101).

However, the API in Petra Jaya, Sarawak - which was worse hit yesterday and recorded a ‘very unhealthy’ level - has dropped from 213 to 177 this morning.

Other areas remaining on the 'unhealthy' list are Sri Aman (178), Samarahan (174), Kuching (167), Sibu (163), Nilai (116), Kapit (110), Bukit Rambai (108), Seremban (105) and Bintulu (103).

The readings in these 15 areas however dropped marginally at 5pm but they remained at a 'very unhealthy level', except for Seri Manjung which recorded 94. (see chart)

Putrajaya hits unhealthy mark

Topping the list is still Sarikei in Sarawak, from 156 yesterday to 195 this morning, and down to 178.

In the Klang Valley, the situation has also worsened with Putrajaya hitting the unhealthy level in the evening. The API for Putrajaya stood at 102 at 5pm today.

The rest are of the readings in the evening are Kuala Lumpur (94, from 91), Shah Alam (97, from 94), Kajang (96, from 90), Port Klang (88, from 86) and Petaling Jaya (87, from 85). Such readings are considered ‘moderate’.

Overall, 33 areas recorded moderate API readings while three areas fall under the category of ‘good’.

API readings range from 0-50 (good), 51-100 (moderate), 101-200 (unhealthy) and 201-300 (very unhealthy). A reading above 300 is considered hazardous to human health.

The API readings are reviewed twice a day at 11am and 5pm.

Video sets the tone in 'Bloody Sunday' inquiry

The video shot by the Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) presented a clear picture of the ‘Bloody Sunday’ incident as the public inquiry conducted by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) kicked off today.
The 17-minute footage showed FRU officials swinging their batons, civilians running away from the water cannons, the crowd dispersing, announcements by one OCPD and by the protesters. It also showed footage of police officers dragging a person for a distance before placing him down.
The video was filmed by FRU officer Lance Corporal Mohd Nasarudin Hashim who testified in front of a panel of Suhakam commissioners comprising KC Vohrah, Choo Siew Kioh, Dr Michael Yeoh and Zaitoon Othman.
Mohd Nasarudin, 29, a camera man for the past two years, explained to the panel what he did on May 28 when the demonstrations took place. He said that OCPD Kamal Bashar had given orders to Chief Inspector Pusparajan and they (the orders) were then directly given to him. “I was there at 8.45am and I had followed my superior, (Chief Inspector) Pusparajan there. He did not ask me to film anything in particular, he told me to just film what was going on,” he said. Nasarudin, under oath, also said that the footage has not been tempered with and was digitally transferred into a CD.

Use of force Earlier, Keadilan information chief Tian Chua was the first to testify in the morning. He was also represented by counsel R Sivarasa and Amer Hamzah. He has described that he tried negotiating with the OCPD that the protesters would disperse by themselves and the use of water cannons would not be necessary. “He warned that kekerasan (force) would be used if we don’t disperse. I was shocked he actually used the word ‘kekerasan’ when we were just protesting peacefully”, Chua told the panel.

Keadilan deputy youth information chief Badrul Hisham was the second to testify, telling the panel that he was dragged by the police shortly after being hit by the water cannon. “I was surrounded by police officers and I was dragged for quite a distance. The back pockets of my pants were all torn,” he said. He added that he was detained in the Pudu police station for five hours with 17 others before being released. Also present was lawyer Edmund Bon who was appearing for the Bar Council.

Fifth inqu
iry
This public inquiry will determine whether any human rights violations occurred and if so:
  • •which person or agency was responsible for the violations; • how such violations came about;
  • what administrative directives and procedures or arrangement contributed to then; and
  • what measure should be recommended to be taken to ensure that such violence do not recur. It will be the fifth held by the human rights watchdog since its formation in 1999.
Previous inquiries were on the the Kesas Highway incident (2001); conditions faced by Internal Security Act detainees (2002); alleged mistreatment of native villagers in Sabah by the police (2004); and the death of S Hendry while in police custody (2006).

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Penyelaras Gerak pelajar terbaik Gwangju Asian Human Right Folk School

KUALA LUMPUR, 3 Okt (Hrkh) - Eksekutif Koordinator, Gerakan Demokrasi dan Anti-Korupsi (Gerak), Badrul Hisham Shaharin, 28, menjadi kebanggaan golongan aktivis negara apabila terpilih sebagai Pelajar terbaik Gwangju Asian Human Right Folk School tahun 2006.

Badrul telah menyertai kursus khas mengenai hak asasi dan demokrasi selama hampir sebulan pada 3 hingga 24 September lalu di Universiti Katolik Gwangju yang dianjurkan oleh Yayasan May 18 Memorial.

Berikutan anugerah itu beliau telah ditawarkan oleh yayasan tersebut biasiswa penuh untuk melanjutkan pengajiannya dalam peringkat Profesional Master Degree dalam bidang Crisis and Management di Sungkonghoe University in Seoul mulai Februari depan.

Sejumlah 20 peserta yang terpilih seluruh Asia dipanggil ke Gwangju.

Gwangju adalah daerah berlakunya kebangkitan rakyat pada 18 Mei 1980 dan kini tempat itu menjadi tumpuan usaha memperkasakan hak asasi dan demokrasi.

Menceritakan pengalamannya di sana, Badrul yang juga Timbalan Ketua Penerangan Angkatan Muda KeADILan (AMK) berkata, di samping peserta mempelajari sejarah kebangkitan rakyat Korea, mereka juga didedahkan dengan pelbagai krisis dan usaha ke arah menyelesaikan krisis di rantau Asia dalam perbagai sesi perbincangan.

Selain pembelajaran secara kuliah oleh pensyarah yang didatangkan khas dari pelbagai negara di Asia, peserta juga diberi peluang melawat tempat tempat bersejarah di seluruh Korea.

Para peserta kemudiannya di bawa ke Joint Security Area (JSA), Panmunjeom (iaitu kawasan krisis yang paling kritikal di rantau tersebut) di mana ia adalah kawasan yang di bawah penguasaan bersama tentera Korea Utara dan Korea Selatan di bawah seliaan tentera Pertubuhan Bangsa-bangsa Bersatu (PBB).

"Bangsa Korea ini kuat kerana ia mengangkat sejarah dalam masyarakat dan hidup bersama sejarah tersebut. Ini yang perlu kita contohi," katanya.

"Ramai tokoh yang dilabelkan pengganas semasa perjuangan menuntut demokrasi akhirnya diangkat dan diakui pengorbanan mereka malah dalam beberapa kes kerajaan memohon maaf atas kesilapan negara masa lalu, tetapi malangnya di Malaysia sendiri terlalu banyak fakta sejarah yang disembunyikan," kata Badrul. - lanh

AMKNS bantu orang miskin, dedah kepincangan pentadbiran Negeri Sembilan

KUALA LUMPUR, 2 Okt (Hrkh) - Dalam meneruskan perjuangan menobatkan keadilan di Malaysia, Angkatan Muda KeADILan Negeri Sembilan (AMKNS) tiada istilah rehat, kedatangan Ramadan kali ini menjadi wadah untuk memperhebatkan aktiviti mendekati rakyat dengan melancarkan kempen kesedaran sempena Ramahdan, kata Pengarah Kempen Ramadannya, Badrul Hisham Shahrim.

Menurutnya, AMKNS melihat, kesempitan hidup dalam keadaan ekonomi tidak menentu ketika ini menambah tekanan kepada hampir keseluruhan rakyat.

Kepedihan ini akan lebih terasa kepada mereka yang sememangnya mengalami kesukaran hidup sebelum ini, justeru sempena Ramadan ini AMKNS tidak akan melupakan golongan fakir di negeri bersendi adat perpatih ini, kata Badrul Hisham semasa memberi maklumat kepada Harakahdaily hari ini.

Dalam program yang dinamakan Jejak Fakir, 12 keluarga telah dipilih untuk diberi bantuan makanan dan kewangan sempena Ramadan, katanya.

Bermula pada 14 dan 15 Oktober, AMKNS akan mengadakan konvoi besar-besaran menuju kediaman lokasi keluarga tersebut untuk menyampaikan bantuan, ujarnya.

Bukan setakat menyampaikan bantuan malah AMKNS turut sedia mengadakan gotong royong membantu keluarga tersebut, katanya.

Lebih menarik katanya, antara keluarga yang turut di senarai menerima bantuan ialah daripada keluarga Tionghua dan India, malah ada antara mereka merupakan ahli dan menyokong Umno semenjak 30 tahun dahulu tetapi gagal mendapatkan sebarang bantuan, katanya.

Ini menunjukkan pendirian jelas KeADILan iaitu membantu sesiapa yang memerlukan tanpa mengira latar belakang, ujarnya.

Bantuan yang disampaikan adalah sumbangan orang ramai yang dikumpulkan. Sesiapa yang prihatin dan turut ingin membantu boleh menyalurkan bantuan dari segi kewangan mahupun barangan dengan menghubungi Azizi 012-369 6474 atau Amiruddin 012-3589872

Sementara itu Badrul Hisham juga memberitahu, dalam bulan yang mulia ini juga AMKNS akan melancarkan kempen kesedaran mengenai kepincangan pengurusan kewangan kerajaan negeri.

AMKNS akan mencetak risalah, poster dan sepanduk mendedahkan laporan Audit Negara (yang dibentangkan di Parlimen) mengenai pembaziran serta salah guna dana bantuan orang miskin oleh kerajaan negeri.

Dalam risalah itu, AMKNS antara lain akan mendedahkan wang sejumlah RM4.5 juta dari dana orang miskin telah digunakan hanya untuk mengubah suai kediaman rasmi MB yang baru sahaja siap.

Selain itu kata Badrul Hisham, risalah juga akan mendedahkan soal penggunaan wang sejumlah RM5.44 untuk membeli perabot Pejabat Daerah Port Dickson dan Seremban.

AMKNS amat kesal dengan pembaziran tersebut dalam keadaan di negeri ini terlalu banyak orang miskin yang sewajarnya dibantu menggunakan dana ini, katanya.

Rakyat negeri ini harus di beritahu perkara ini, justeru AMKNS akan menumpukan pengerdaran di masjid dan pasar Ramadan untuk menyebarkan makluman ini, kata Badrul Hisham. - lanh

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

lagi gambar di Korea

bersama Black @ Amin (Intern di May 18 Memorial Foundation) dan Athia (FNBKL) depan PSPD
bersama peserta lain di Restoran ala Korea di Seoul
bersama Ayien (Empower) Batu deklarasi 'Joint Security Area'